The article discusses the ongoing conflict in Gaza, highlighting the horrors experienced by its residents and the attempts by some Israelis to deny or downplay these realities. It reflects on the emotional impact of graphic images and the broader implications of the conflict on Israeli-Palestinian relations. The piece also touches on issues of land registration involving the Jewish National Fund, suggesting a complex interplay of historical and current tensions.

Following the events of October 7, 2024, Israel has experienced a significant political shift towards the far right, with the current government implementing policies that reflect this change. The Likud party, traditionally a standard-bearer of the Israeli right, has become ideologically aligned with the hard right, influenced by figures like Benjamin Netanyahu, Itamar Ben-Gvir, and Bezalel Smotrich. This shift is characterized by increased military actions in Gaza, discussions of resettling Gaza, and a push towards West Bank annexation. Despite these developments, public support for the far-right coalition has fluctuated, with some Israelis expressing frustration with Netanyahu's leadership and seeking strong, secular leaders who prioritize security. The article highlights the complex dynamics within Israeli society, including the diverse perspectives of individuals like Or Gabbay and Orit Ofer, and the potential for future political changes driven by pragmatic right-wing hawks.

In July 2024, Israel faced significant internal turmoil as protesters, including far-right officials, opposed military actions against Israeli reservists accused of abuses. The unrest highlighted the strain on Israel's institutions amid ongoing conflicts with Hamas and Hezbollah. The Netanyahu government has been criticized for undermining judicial independence and pursuing annexation of the West Bank, exacerbating tensions. Israel's lack of a formal constitution and democratic foundations has enabled these challenges. The article argues for a constitutional process to address democratic deficits and suggests that resolving these issues is crucial for lasting peace and stability.

The Netanyahu government's judicial overhaul plans, which had been on hold, are now resurfacing amidst the Gaza war. A recent leak suggests that the Supreme Court of Israel is preparing to strike down the controversial 'reasonability standard' law, a significant setback for the government. The public's attention is divided due to the ongoing conflict, allowing the government to potentially extend its powers unchecked.

Yoav Gallant, Israel's defense minister, has twice publicly defied Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, challenging his policies on Gaza and judicial reforms. Despite his interventions, Gallant remains a key figure in the government, which has faced criticism for its actions. The International Criminal Court has called for his arrest on war crimes charges. Gallant's future role could be pivotal in determining Israel's path, either as a genuine alternative to populist leadership or as a representative of the status quo.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's opposition to recognizing a Palestinian state is critiqued as historically and morally flawed. The article argues that Palestinian statehood is a legitimate aspiration, despite Netanyahu's claims that it rewards terrorism. It highlights the historical context of state formation through conflict and the necessity of mutual security cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians. The piece also criticizes the Israeli government's unilateral actions and stresses the urgency of a political solution to prevent further despair and violence in Palestinian territories.

Dr. Dahlia Scheindlin's book, 'The Crooked Timber of Democracy in Israel,' provides a comprehensive analysis of Israel's democratic crisis, emphasizing the dynamic relations between Jewish and Arab citizens and the impact of the occupation of Palestinian territories. The book is praised for its historical perspective, fresh data, and nuanced understanding of Israel's current crisis and future prospects. It serves as a valuable resource for understanding Israeli reactions to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack and the ongoing challenges the country faces.

Israel intercepted a major attack from Iran, avoiding significant damage, but the Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, faces criticism for considering further military escalation. Ultra-nationalist cabinet members, including Itamar Ben-Gvir, push for aggressive responses, risking broader conflict in the Middle East. The article highlights the ongoing violence in the West Bank and Gaza, the humanitarian crisis, and the failure of Netanyahu's policies to ensure security. It calls for a reconsideration of peace efforts over perpetual warfare, noting the historical success of peace treaties with Jordan and Egypt.

The article critiques the traditional two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, proposing instead a confederated approach that allows for national self-determination while maintaining open borders, freedom of movement, and shared institutions. It argues that complete separation has failed and that cooperation, open access, and resource sharing are the only viable paths forward. The author references the grassroots movement 'A Land for All' and suggests that the confederation model would allow for both Israelis and Palestinians to live, work, and study in either state without affecting national elections. The article also discusses the economic and security benefits of this approach and calls for multilateral efforts to address the situation in Gaza.

Israel's recent rescue of two hostages from Gaza by the Israeli military has evoked memories of the 1976 Entebbe operation, though the myth of invincibility from that era is flawed. The current hostage negotiations with Hamas are fraught with public contradictions and demoralization, as Israelis grapple with the opaque and halting progress. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's promises of achieving both hostage release and defeating Hamas are seen as fundamentally irreconcilable, contributing to the ongoing conflict and occupation.