The UN has condemned the suppression of Western media coverage of Israeli actions in Gaza, with Albanese denouncing the severity of the atrocities. The UNRWA reported the death of at least 200 of its workers and highlighted the displacement of 250,000 people from Khan Yunis, emphasizing the lack of safe places in Gaza.

The Venezuelan National Assembly has approved a request to sever diplomatic, commercial, and consular relations with Spain, citing the country's patience in dealing with Spain. This decision reflects ongoing tensions between Venezuela and Spain, highlighting the Venezuelan government's stance on international relations.

Fandom, while offering a sense of belonging and passion, can also lead to obsession and misinformation. The 1999 film 'Galaxy Quest' remains a relevant critique of fandom, highlighting both its positive and negative aspects. The film's narrative, which spoofs 'Star Trek' and its fans, underscores the importance of media literacy and the potential dangers of blind devotion. The article discusses how fans can influence media, sometimes positively by contributing to projects they love, but also negatively through harassment and toxic campaigns. The legacy of 'Galaxy Quest' and its characters, including parallels to real-life figures like William Shatner, emphasizes the power and responsibility of fandom.

The creator of Netflix's 'Cobra Kai', Hayden Schlossberg, revealed that the show was heavily inspired by HBO's violent prison drama 'Oz'. 'Oz' was a groundbreaking series that influenced many subsequent TV shows, including 'The Sopranos' and 'Breaking Bad'. Schlossberg and his team re-watched 'Oz' episodes during the production of 'Cobra Kai' season 4. The article highlights the enduring legacy of 'Oz' and its impact on television, as well as the journey of 'Cobra Kai' from YouTube to Netflix.

A poll by SWG research institute shows that 52% of Italians now see China as a friendly nation, a significant increase from the previous year, while the US's favorable rating has dropped. The Atlantic Council attributes this shift to China's effective propaganda and the Italian media's role in it. The article suggests that China's early aid during the COVID-19 crisis and the US's less favorable actions internationally have influenced Italian perceptions. It also notes that Italy's relationship with China was already scrutinized by Western media before the pandemic due to Italy's involvement in China's Silk Road initiative. Additionally, 45% of Italians view Germany and France as enemies, possibly due to their initial refusal to export critical supplies to Italy. The article argues that while China has been managing its international image, the West's own failures have facilitated China's advantageous position.

The article criticizes the British government for promoting business opportunities in Chinese wet markets despite public health warnings. It highlights the perceived hypocrisy of British officials, including former PMs Theresa May and David Cameron, who encouraged trade with these markets while public health bodies warned against them. The article also discusses the global debate on the safety of wet markets, with input from various health experts and organizations. It calls for British journalists to hold their government accountable for its actions.

The article criticizes the European Union's inadequate response to Italy's Covid-19 crisis, highlighting how Russia, China, and Cuba stepped in to provide aid. It condemns Western media, particularly Coda Story, for portraying Russian aid as an influence operation while ignoring the EU's failures. The piece underscores the irony of Western organizations like the European Endowment for Democracy, which it claims engage in similar influence operations. The article suggests that the EU's inaction has damaged its credibility and solidarity, making Russian aid necessary.

The article criticizes the New York Times for portraying Bernie Sanders' 1980s Soviet outreach efforts as propaganda, arguing instead that Sanders demonstrated a genuine commitment to diplomacy. It highlights the repetitive nature of allegations linking Sanders to Russian interference, comparing it to the 2016 'Russiagate' narrative. The piece defends Sanders' actions, including his praise for Soviet hosts and his call for increased citizen-to-citizen contact, and suggests that such diplomacy is still needed today. The article also draws parallels to similar smears faced by Tulsi Gabbard.

UK investor Bill Browder criticizes Bernie Sanders for a 2012 vote on the Magnitsky Act, accusing him of being a Russian pawn. The article delves into Browder's controversial background, highlighting his tax evasion, embezzlement, and manipulation of Western governments. It questions Browder's motives and credibility, suggesting his attacks on Sanders are politically motivated. The piece also references investigations and documentaries that challenge Browder's narrative, portraying him as corrupt and manipulative.

Mike Bloomberg faced severe criticism from his Democratic rivals during the Nevada debate, with Bernie Sanders emerging as the clear frontrunner. Bloomberg's performance was widely seen as unprepared and out-of-touch, particularly on issues like 'stop and frisk' and his treatment of women. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders had standout moments, with Sanders emphasizing the need for a political revolution and critiquing the current system's inequality. The article suggests that Sanders' progressive ideals resonate with many Americans facing economic hardships, contrasting sharply with Bloomberg's wealth and centrist policies.

Bernie Sanders' victory in the New Hampshire primary is downplayed by mainstream US media, which instead focuses on Amy Klobuchar's third-place finish. The article criticizes media outlets like CNN, Fox News, Reuters, and MSNBC for ignoring or minimizing Sanders' success, suggesting a bias against his candidacy. It highlights the media's preference for centrist candidates and their attempts to undermine Sanders' electability despite his consistent frontrunner status and popular vote wins in both Iowa and New Hampshire.

The app designed to report Iowa caucus results, developed by Shadow Inc, failed during the crucial moment. Shadow Inc has ties to the Democratic establishment and was paid by Pete Buttigieg's campaign, leading to suspicions of bias, especially among Bernie Sanders' supporters. The company's executives have connections to Hillary Clinton's campaign, and ACRONYM, the digital non-profit that launched Shadow, tried to distance itself from the company post-debacle. Rumors also involve Robby Mook's security company in vetting the app. The DNC's history of bias against Sanders in 2016 adds to the controversy. Despite no official results, Buttigieg declared victory, while Sanders' camp released data suggesting his win, fueling further distrust and anger among progressives.

Donald Trump claimed a complete defeat of ISIS and touted his 'deal of the century' for the Israel-Palestine conflict, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. Experts warn that ISIS remains active and is regaining strength, particularly in the wake of heightened US-Iran tensions following the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. The article criticizes Trump's exaggerated claims and highlights the contributions of other nations and militias in combating ISIS.

Donald Trump threatened to cut off Iraq's access to its Federal Reserve Bank account if Baghdad insists on US troop withdrawal, likening it to modern-day colonialism. The Iraqi parliament voted for US troop removal, but Trump responded with threats of severe economic sanctions. The US State Department ignored the resolution, asserting the US presence as a force for good. The article criticizes the US for using economic leverage and military presence to dictate terms in Iraq, drawing parallels to past administrations' tactics and highlighting the growing unease among Iraqis about US intentions.

Joe Biden's recent ad mocking Donald Trump mirrors Hillary Clinton's failed 2016 strategy, focusing on Trump's character flaws rather than substantive policy differences. The ad, featuring world leaders mocking Trump, is unlikely to win over swing voters and may backfire by reinforcing Trump's populist image. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders is gaining traction with his progressive platform, leading in key states and among college students. Biden's reliance on establishment-friendly tactics may jeopardize his frontrunner status.

The article discusses the ongoing UK election and the frequent accusations of political figures being Russian agents. Both Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn have faced such allegations, with the article highlighting the absurdity and lack of evidence behind these claims. The piece also touches on the broader use of smear tactics in political campaigns, referencing the NHS, the Trump administration, and various reports and organizations.

Lawrence O'Donnell's retraction of a story claiming Donald Trump received loans co-signed by Russian billionaires highlights a trend of accountability-free journalism. The article criticizes MSNBC and other media outlets for prioritizing sensationalism over verified facts, leading to a decline in public trust. It discusses the broader issue of false reporting and its impact on media credibility, particularly in the context of US politics and the Trump administration.

The article critiques a Sky News op-ed by Deborah Haynes that laments the erosion of the 'rules-based international order.' It argues that this system is a myth, primarily used by Western powers to justify their actions while criticizing others. The piece highlights various instances of Western hypocrisy, including military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Yemen, and the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. It also criticizes the US and UK for their foreign policies and actions, suggesting that the so-called rules-based order exists only in theory and is manipulated to serve Western interests.

Europe has appointed new leaders without a democratic process, highlighting the EU's undemocratic nature. Ursula von der Leyen, Josep Borrell Fontelles, Christine Lagarde, and Charles Michel have been selected for top EU positions without public votes or debates. The article questions the EU's legitimacy and connection to its citizens, citing the late Austrian political thinker Leopold Kohr, who advocated for smaller states as the true form of democracy.

A viral video of DOJ lawyer Sarah Fabian arguing against providing basic hygiene items to children in US border detention centers has sparked outrage. While Fabian has been criticized, the article argues that the real issue lies in the systemic failures of the US immigration system, which has persisted across both the Obama and Trump administrations. The text highlights the hypocrisy of a nation that spends heavily on defense but cannot provide basic necessities to detained migrant children, and criticizes the media and public for focusing on individual blame rather than addressing broader systemic problems.

The article criticizes the United States for its 'recognition' of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, a region internationally recognized as Syrian territory. It argues that such actions are consistent with a history of US violations of other countries' sovereignty, including military interventions and economic sanctions. The piece suggests that US foreign policy is hypocritical, as it preaches democracy and human rights while engaging in regime changes and supporting undemocratic actions abroad. The article also critiques the US media for failing to hold the government accountable for these actions.

Following the arrest of American citizen Paul Whelan in Moscow on espionage charges, former U.S. Ambassador Michael McFaul advised against traveling to Russia, prompting criticism from RT journalist Danielle Ryan. Ryan argued that McFaul's stance exemplifies double standards, contrasting Whelan's case with that of Russian citizen Maria Butina, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy in the U.S. The article critiques Ryan's claims, highlighting Russia's higher homicide rates and questioning the reliability of Russian crime statistics. It also notes the U.S. State Department's travel advisory for Russia, emphasizing the risks of arbitrary detention and harassment.

The article criticizes Meghan McCain's speech at her father's funeral for attempting to rewrite the history of the Vietnam War. It condemns the media's portrayal of John McCain's legacy and criticizes the presence of political figures like Henry Kissinger, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama at the funeral. The text argues that the media's mourning of McCain is a desperate attempt to restore normalcy in the face of Donald Trump's presidency, which it views as exposing the true nature of America.

John McCain's funeral is criticized as an exercise in historical revisionism, with Meghan McCain's speech recasting the Vietnam War in a positive light. The article condemns the media's portrayal of McCain's legacy, highlighting his controversial actions and statements. It also criticizes the media's framing of the funeral as an anti-Trump resistance meeting, pointing out the hypocrisy of celebrating figures like Henry Kissinger and George W. Bush. The piece underscores the need to critically examine the legacies of public figures, even in the immediate aftermath of their deaths.

Jameela Jamil criticizes the Kardashian family for promoting harmful body image messages and products like appetite-suppressant lollipops. She labels them as 'double agents for the patriarchy,' profiting from and perpetuating damaging societal standards. Despite facing backlash, Jamil stands firm in her stance, emphasizing the need for constructive criticism and expressing sadness over the Kardashians' influence on young women.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old socialist and former Bernie Sanders volunteer, has defeated 10-term incumbent Joe Crowley in New York's Democratic congressional primary. Her victory, with 57.5 percent of the vote, challenges the Democratic establishment and suggests a shift towards progressive policies such as abolishing ICE, medicare for all, and free university education. Ocasio-Cortez's campaign, which rejected corporate donations and raised significant small donations, contrasts with the perceived complacency of establishment figures like Crowley. Her win is seen as a message to Democrats to embrace progressive change or risk further losses, drawing parallels to the party's defeat in the 2016 presidential election.

The article explores the historical context and evolution of US-Russia relations, challenging the narrative that Russian aggression is the primary cause of current tensions. It highlights the efforts of Russian leaders from Gorbachev to Putin to integrate with the West, only to be met with actions that weakened Russia economically and militarily. The text argues that hostility towards Russia is an ingrained aspect of American foreign policy, citing various instances where Russian overtures were rebuffed or met with expansionist moves by NATO.

The article criticizes the US Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into Jill Stein, accusing it of being a baseless witch hunt driven by Democrats' frustration over their 2016 election loss. It highlights the negative media coverage Stein received from platforms like ThinkProgress and Vice, labeling it as neo-McCarthyism. The piece defends Stein and other dissenting voices against accusations of Russian collusion, arguing that the Democrats' actions are aimed at discrediting all opposition. The article also humorously mentions Lindsay Lohan in the context of the current political climate.

Jedediah Bila's abrupt departure from 'The View' highlights the show's ongoing struggle with conservative co-hosts. Bila, a libertarian-conservative, was reportedly not conservative enough for network executives, leading to her replacement by Meghan McCain. The article criticizes the media's promotion of extreme voices and the lack of nuanced debate, suggesting that 'The View' should have retained Bila for a more balanced discussion. The piece also reflects on the broader media and political culture, lamenting the audience's difficulty in connecting with moderate viewpoints.

President Donald Trump's speech at the United Nations General Assembly, which included threats to destroy North Korea, has raised questions about why North Korea would consider disarming. The article argues that North Korea views its nuclear arsenal as essential for its defense against the US, especially given historical conflicts and current US rhetoric. The piece also critiques Trump's approach as provocative and counterproductive, suggesting it reinforces North Korea's resolve to maintain its nuclear capabilities.

The article discusses the complex and contentious issue of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland in the context of Brexit. It highlights the logistical and political challenges of maintaining a 'soft' border post-Brexit, the potential for renewed violence, and the differing positions of the British government, the EU, and the Irish government. The article also touches on the historical context of the Troubles and the psychological impact of potentially reintroducing a 'hard' border. The British government's proposals have been criticized as unrealistic, and the EU is unlikely to agree to an unmonitored border. The idea of a united Ireland is mentioned as a potential solution but is politically sensitive.

A new report, largely authored by former U.S. intelligence officers and published by The Nation, claims forensic evidence suggests the Democratic National Committee was not hacked by Russians in July 2016 but instead suffered an insider leak by someone with physical access to a DNC computer in the Eastern time zone of the United States.

A new report by Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) challenges the narrative that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) was hacked by Russians in 2016, suggesting instead that it was an insider leak. The report, supported by forensic evidence, claims that the data transfer speed indicates a local download rather than a remote hack. The article criticizes the media and intelligence agencies for not rigorously examining the evidence and for promoting a narrative that may have been politically motivated. The findings, if true, could significantly impact U.S.-Russia relations and the credibility of the DNC and mainstream media.

The British public's outrage forced American billionaire Stan Kroenke to abandon plans for a TV channel dedicated to trophy hunting. The channel, My Outdoor TV, faced backlash for intending to air footage of hunting endangered African species. Despite initial defenses by spokesperson Simon Barr, Kroenke retracted the content. The article criticizes the notion that trophy hunting aids conservation, citing reports that debunk such claims and highlight the negative impact on wildlife populations. It also mentions the controversial killing of Cecil the lion and the involvement of Donald Trump's sons in trophy hunting.

The article critiques the Trump administration's foreign policy, particularly its decision to end the CIA program to arm Syrian rebels and its inconsistent stance on Ukraine. It argues that while ending the CIA program made sense due to its ineffectiveness, the administration's overall foreign policy is erratic and sends mixed messages. The article highlights the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and questions the strategic coherence of Trump's actions, suggesting that they may be driven by personal grievances and a desire to balance relations with Russia.

The article exposes the disturbing realities of the pet food industry, highlighting the presence of harmful substances like pentobarbital in dog food due to the use of euthanized animals and other contaminated materials. It criticizes the lack of stringent regulations and oversight by the FDA in the U.S., contrasting it with stricter enforcement in the European Union. The piece also discusses the deceptive marketing practices of pet food companies and the growing trend of raw feeding as a healthier alternative. The author advocates for greater consumer education to drive industry change.

The article discusses the potential benefits of President Donald Trump achieving a new détente with Russia, highlighting the positive outcomes of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, such as a ceasefire in Syria and diplomatic efforts in Ukraine. It argues that improved relations between the U.S. and Russia could lead to significant global benefits, despite opposition from liberals and neoconservatives. The text emphasizes the importance of diplomacy and compromise in foreign policy, while acknowledging the challenges Trump faces in making concessions to Russia.

The article criticizes the media, particularly CNN, for its sensationalist and often inaccurate coverage of the Trump-Russia story. It highlights recent incidents where CNN had to retract stories and discusses the broader issue of media sensationalism, which the author argues is driven by ratings rather than a genuine pursuit of truth. The piece also reflects on historical and cultural perspectives on Russia, suggesting that the media's current approach is reminiscent of Cold War-era attitudes. The author calls for more careful and accurate reporting to maintain credibility and effectively inform the public.

The article discusses the exploitation of children like Omran Daqneesh and Bana Alabed by both sides in the Syrian Civil War to push their agendas. It criticizes the Western media for using Omran's image to promote regime change in Syria and highlights the political bias of the White Helmets. The piece also questions the objectivity of Western journalists and points out the selective outrage over suffering children based on the narrative they fit. The article underscores the hypocrisy of both sides in using children as symbols of the other's crimes.

Hillary Clinton, in a recent interview, continues to attribute her 2016 election loss to external factors such as Russian interference, fake news, and sexism, while failing to acknowledge any personal or campaign misjudgments. She criticizes the Democratic National Committee's data, the FBI's handling of her email investigation, and the influence of WikiLeaks. The article suggests that Clinton's refusal to accept responsibility and move on is detrimental to the Democratic Party's future prospects.

Senator John McCain's assertion that Vladimir Putin is a greater threat to global security than ISIS is criticized as an exaggeration. The article argues that while Russia has significant military capabilities, it does not pose an existential threat to the United States. It highlights the hypocrisy in American outrage over election interference, given the U.S.'s history of meddling in foreign elections, particularly in Russia during the 1990s. The piece suggests that deteriorating U.S.-Russia relations pose a greater threat to global security than either Russia or ISIS alone.

President Donald Trump's campaign promises to defeat ISIS with a 'secret plan' have proven ineffective. His reliance on allies like Saudi Arabia and Turkey, who have been accused of supporting extremism, undermines his efforts. The article criticizes Trump's inconsistent stance and highlights the complexities of the Middle Eastern conflict, suggesting that his approach may exacerbate terrorism rather than eliminate it.

The article critically examines the firing of former FBI director James Comey, highlighting inconsistencies and hypocrisies in both liberal and conservative reactions. It discusses the liberal shift from condemning Comey to defending him, and questions the Trump administration's rationale for the dismissal. The piece also explores the potential implications of the firing on the Russia investigation and suggests that Trump's actions may be driven by personal grievances and miscalculations.

Reports of anti-gay violence in Chechnya have placed Russian President Vladimir Putin in a difficult position. Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov denies the allegations, but evidence suggests otherwise. The Kremlin's reluctance to condemn Kadyrov is tied to the need for stability in the volatile region. Investigative efforts by Novaya Gazeta and the Guardian highlight the risks faced by journalists. The situation underscores the tension between maintaining regional control and addressing human rights abuses.

President Donald Trump ordered a missile strike on a Syrian airbase in response to an alleged chemical attack by Assad's forces. The media's enthusiastic support for the strike is criticized, with concerns about the lack of investigation and the potential for misinformation reminiscent of the Iraq war. The article questions Trump's motives and the media's role in shaping public perception, warning of the dangers of escalating conflict with Russia.

The article discusses the double standards in the Western media's coverage of terrorist attacks in Russia compared to those in Western countries. It highlights the immediate blame placed on Russia's foreign policy in Syria for the St. Petersburg metro attack, contrasting it with the lack of similar scrutiny for Western interventions in the Middle East. The piece criticizes the Western response to the attack, noting the lack of solidarity shown to Russia compared to other Western nations. It also questions the broader implications of ongoing geopolitical conflicts and the resulting violence.

Alexey Navalny, a prominent Russian opposition leader and critic of Vladimir Putin, is often portrayed as a hero in Western media. However, the article highlights his nationalist leanings, ties to neo-Nazi groups, and extreme anti-immigrant views, which are frequently downplayed or ignored in Western coverage. The piece argues that Western audiences tend to oversimplify Russian politics, casting Navalny as a 'good guy' without acknowledging the complexities of his political stance.

Anti-corruption protests erupted across Russia, leading to the arrest of opposition leader Alexey Navalny, who accused Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev of corruption. While Navalny is often portrayed as a hero in Western media, the article highlights his nationalist and xenophobic views, questioning the oversimplified narrative of him as a progressive democrat. The piece also discusses the complexities of Russian politics, noting that both Putin and Navalny share similar stances on Crimea, and warns against blindly supporting opposition figures without understanding their full political stance.

Ivanka Trump's increasing role in the Trump White House, including her West Wing office and security clearance, raises ethical questions and highlights her privilege. Despite her advocacy for women's issues, her actions and initiatives, such as 'Women Who Work,' are criticized as unrelatable and ineffective. Similarly, Chelsea Clinton's recognition at Variety magazine's Power of Women event underscores the advantages of being born to wealthy and powerful parents, with her achievements often perceived as stemming from privilege rather than merit.

The article discusses the significant reduction in Russia's defense budget, which has been cut by 25.5 percent for 2017, according to the Russian Federal Treasury. This is the largest cut since the early 1990s and contrasts with the previous years of military spending increases. The author suggests that the cuts are a result of economic pressures from Western sanctions and low oil prices, rather than a change in Russia's military ambitions. The article criticizes the Western media's lack of attention to this development and challenges the prevailing narrative of Russia as an aggressive threat. It also compares Russian military spending with that of the U.S. and questions the rationality of Western perceptions of Russia, citing a personal anecdote from a hiking trip in Siberia to illustrate misconceptions about Russian intentions.

The article discusses the implications of WikiLeaks' 'Vault 7' leaks, which reveal the CIA's hacking capabilities and potential for misdirecting attribution, complicating the narrative around Russian involvement in the DNC hacks. It questions the evidence provided by cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike and FireEye, suggesting that the CIA could have fabricated evidence to implicate Russia. The piece emphasizes the need for skepticism towards government and media narratives, advocating for more rigorous journalistic standards to uncover the truth.

Michael Flynn's resignation as national security adviser has sparked discussions about Russian interference in American politics and the potential existence of a 'deep state' coup against Trump. Flynn's misleading of Vice President Mike Pence about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak led to his resignation. The article explores the possibility of powerful forces within the U.S. intelligence community working to reignite the Cold War and prevent improved relations with Russia. Former Democratic congressman Dennis Kucinich argues that Flynn's departure is part of a broader effort by the intelligence community to undermine Trump and maintain the military-industrial complex's influence. The article also touches on the muted response from the Kremlin and the broader implications for U.S.-Russia relations.

The article critiques the oversimplified and conspiratorial narratives surrounding Donald Trump's relationship with Russia, emphasizing that the Russian government is not as enthusiastic about Trump as commonly believed. It highlights the Kremlin's preference for predictability, concerns over Trump's impulsive nature, and the mixed signals from Trump's administration regarding Russia. The piece calls for a more sober and realistic analysis of US-Russia relations, moving away from Cold War-era conspiracy theories.

Journalism's decline is attributed to a clickbait-driven media environment and groupthink, leading to a lack of fact-checking and the rise of unverified reporting. The article criticizes the practice of prioritizing speed and quantity over quality and accuracy, and the reliance on anonymous sources. It highlights the negative impact of such practices on the profession's reputation and their role in the election of Donald Trump. The article calls for a return to responsible journalism, exemplified by the careful informing of the public and adherence to facts, as opposed to the dissemination of rumors and gossip.

In the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, the Limerick Soviet emerged as a significant workers' movement in Ireland, inspired by global socialist sentiments. Triggered by the arrest and death of trade unionist Robert Byrne, the workers of Limerick established a soviet that controlled the city, rationed food, and maintained order. Despite initial success, the movement was short-lived due to pressure from the British government, the Catholic Church, and business owners. The article reflects on whether the Limerick Soviet could have led to a broader socialist revolution in Ireland, concluding that nationalism took precedence over socialism at the time.