Western military aid to Ukraine has been criticized for being delayed and ineffective, with senior Ukrainian officers highlighting strategic failures and corruption as major obstacles. Despite significant financial and military support from the US and Europe, Ukraine struggles to match Russian forces, leading to calls for more traditional weaponry and a reassessment of current strategies. The article questions the wisdom of past decisions by Ukrainian leadership and suggests that the real casualty figures and effectiveness of aid are being misrepresented, potentially leading to a reconsideration of continued support.

The article criticizes Hollywood Reporter’s Scott Roxborough and the OCCRP for allegedly spreading false information about Oliver Stone and Igor Lopatonok's involvement in corruption tied to Kazakhstan's former president, Nursultan Nazarbayev. It defends Stone and Lopatonok, arguing that the accusations are baseless and part of a broader media smear campaign. The piece also touches on the media's role in perpetuating misinformation and criticizes the OCCRP's journalistic practices.

A Fulton County judge dismissed six counts in the election interference indictment against Donald Trump and several co-defendants, citing insufficient specificity in the allegations. The ruling, seen as a win for Trump, leaves him facing 10 counts, including a racketeering charge. The decision allows the district attorney's office six months to refile the dismissed charges. The judge's order also dismissed counts against Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, John Eastman, Ray Smith III, and Robert Cheeley, raising questions about the prosecution's case. Trump's attorney praised the ruling, while Trump denounced the investigation as politically motivated.

Joe Biden has secured the Democratic Party nomination for the 2024 presidential election after winning the required delegates in Georgia. Despite low approval ratings and concerns about his age and mental acuity, Biden is set for a rematch with Donald Trump, who is expected to be the Republican nominee. Biden's campaign focuses on contrasting his support for Ukraine and NATO expansion with Trump's admiration for Putin. However, Biden's presidency has been criticized for the mishandled withdrawal from Afghanistan, inadequate handling of immigration, and his advanced age. A special counsel's investigation into Biden's mishandling of classified documents concluded without prosecution, attributing Biden's actions to memory lapses.

Pope Francis's suggestion for Ukraine to negotiate with Russia sparked controversy, with Kyiv and European leaders criticizing his remarks. Ukraine's Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba emphasized the country's determination, while NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg insisted on military support for Ukraine rather than negotiations. The Kremlin found the Pope's call for talks understandable, but NATO's stance remains firm against what it perceives as surrender. The article suggests NATO's strategy may lead to unnecessary Ukrainian casualties and criticizes the Ukrainian government's past negotiation failures.

French President Emmanuel Macron's suggestion of potentially deploying Western troops to Ukraine has isolated him among European leaders. His comments at a Paris conference on February 26 sparked immediate reactions from the U.S. and Europe, who reiterated their stance against sending troops. U.S. Lieutenant General (Ret.) Ben Hodges highlighted the importance of strategic ambiguity, while French Foreign Minister Stephane Sejourne provided a vague clarification. Western leaders, including President Biden and U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, maintain their position of providing military aid without troop deployment. Macron's remarks have caused a rift with Germany, potentially affecting the alliance and the course of the war.

The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), funded by George Soros and the US State Department, is accused of targeting conservative Americans and Trump supporters, including Hollywood documentary producer Igor Lopatonok. The article claims the OCCRP's reporting is biased and politically motivated, serving as hit pieces rather than factual journalism. It also alleges that Soros's influence extends to the media, with significant donations to various media groups. The article criticizes the OCCRP's legal defense against numerous lawsuits and suggests that their reporting on the Adani Group in India was an attack rather than investigative journalism. The text portrays the OCCRP and its backers as a threat to free speech and democracy, and calls for the shutdown of their media efforts.

The article claims that Irina Shevchenko, a Ukrainian hacker known as 'Alice,' was responsible for the DNC hack, not the Russian government. It argues that Hillary Clinton ordered the hack to prevent further leaks about her campaign. The text exonerates Julian Assange and WikiLeaks from involvement in the DNC hack, suggesting that various U.S. government agencies and Ukrainian groups were complicit in an Information Operation against Donald Trump. The article criticizes the FBI, CIA, and other organizations for their roles in the alleged cover-up and manipulation of information.

The article argues that Nina Jankowicz, a former strategic communications expert for the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Relations, continues to work for Ukraine in a capacity similar to a lobbyist. It claims that the US Disinformation Governance Board is modeled after Ukraine's Ministry of Information Policy, which allegedly aims to suppress dissenting voices and instill Ukrainian nationalism into American politics. The text criticizes various individuals and organizations, including the Democratic Party, for their roles in disinformation campaigns against conservative figures like Donald Trump. It also suggests that the Biden administration's policies are designed to force Americans to conform to specific narratives or face social and economic repercussions.

The article accuses Ukraine, under President Volodymyr Zelensky, of directing cyber attacks on critical US and EU infrastructure, including the New York Stock Exchange and German infrastructure. It claims that the Ukraine IT Army, with over 300,000 volunteers, is behind these attacks, allegedly supported by the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine and SCL-IOTA Global. The piece criticizes US President Joe Biden and other Democratic leaders for their support of Ukraine, suggesting that this support enables Ukraine's actions. The article calls for conservatives to recognize and oppose these alleged attacks.

The article alleges that the Bucha massacre, where over 300 bodies were found, was a result of actions by Ukrainian nationalists, particularly the Azov Battalion, under the orders of President Zelensky. It criticizes the Western media and leaders, including Joe Biden, for their portrayal of the events and support for Ukraine. The text suggests that the massacre was used as a tool by Zelensky to garner Western military support and accuses Ukrainian forces of targeting civilians. The article also highlights the role of the US State Department in supporting controversial Ukrainian figures.

The article alleges that the German Green Party, with support from the Biden administration, was behind the Nord Stream pipeline bombings and had a significant role in the 2020 US elections. It details the training and involvement of Ukrainian deep-water demolition divers and accuses various US and international organizations of supporting a broader agenda to undermine democracy and enforce austerity measures. The narrative is highly critical of left-wing political figures and policies, suggesting a coordinated effort to manipulate political outcomes and suppress freedoms.

Ukraine's actions, supported by Congressional Democrats and influenced by Ukrainian lobbies, are targeting US and EU infrastructure to pressure companies to cease business in Russia. This has led to the classification of US teen volunteers and donors as combatants, equating them to terrorists. The article criticizes the involvement of prominent Democratic figures and raises concerns about the safety of American youths and the potential political motivations behind these actions.

Seymour Hersh, a US journalist, defends a CIA plan to sabotage President Biden’s re-election campaign while attacking investigative journalists. Hersh's recent interviews reveal several factual errors and criticisms of Biden's administration, the CIA, and the State Department. He also discusses the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, highlighting mistakes and misinformation in his reports. The article critiques Hersh's credibility and the actions of the US government, with a focus on the geopolitical implications of the Nord Stream incident and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

The article criticizes Western media and political narratives for omitting, distorting, and exaggerating information about the Russia-Ukraine conflict. It highlights the role of Canadian politicians and organizations in supporting military aid to Ukraine, while accusing NATO and the U.S. of escalating tensions and manipulating Ukrainian politics. The text presents a strong bias against Western actions and supports the perspective of individuals like George Eliason, who provide a counter-narrative to mainstream media. The article also discusses the historical context of Ukrainian nationalism and the influence of fascist ideologies.

George Eliason and Vanessa Beeley, both recipients of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism, discuss the situation in Ukraine, with Eliason providing on-the-ground insights from Donbass. The article challenges mainstream narratives about the Ukraine conflict, suggesting that the public has been misled by a 'carefully planned, deliberate lie.' It also touches on the potential financial motivations behind the conflict, such as the shelling of a nuclear plant to secure long-term funding. The piece includes criticism of NATO, the European Union, and various government officials for their roles in the conflict and the persecution of journalists. Vanessa Beeley's journalism is praised, and the article encourages readers to support and share her work.

The article argues that the real perpetrators of the 2016 DNC hacks were Ukrainian hacker groups working with Ukrainian intelligence, not the Russian government or Julian Assange. It claims that these groups, including Cyber Alliance, RUH8, and CyberHunta, were active from 2014 and collaborated with Crowdstrike and other entities. The article criticizes the FBI, ODNI, CIA, NSA, and other organizations for complicity and failure to investigate properly. It calls for a reassessment of sanctions on Russia and a reckoning for Ukraine's actions.

The article explores a speculative theory that the January 6th Capitol riot was orchestrated by Ukrainian military forces in collaboration with groups like Antifa, BLM, and white nationalists to discredit Donald Trump. It delves into the involvement of various actors and organizations, suggesting a coordinated effort to undermine Trump's presidency and support the Biden-Harris administration. The narrative is highly subjective, with numerous unverified claims and personal interpretations.

The article posits that the January 6th Capitol riot was a Ukrainian military special operation aimed at discrediting Donald Trump. It suggests that various nationalist groups, including Antifa, BLM, and the Proud Boys, were manipulated or coordinated by Ukrainian entities like the Azov Battalion. The author argues that these groups, despite their apparent ideological differences, share a common nationalist agenda and were used to instigate violence. The article also implicates high-profile figures such as Joe Biden and Petr Poroshenko in a broader conspiracy, suggesting a quid pro quo arrangement for U.S. support to Ukraine.

The article alleges that Ukrainian neo-Nazis, in collaboration with Antifa and BLM, were involved in the Capitol Hill siege on January 6, 2021. It claims that Ukrainian nationalists, supported by former Ukrainian president Petr Poroshenko, have a history of violent activities and were brought into the US under the Obama administration. The article suggests that these groups aimed to disrupt Donald Trump's presidency and election campaign. It also implicates Joe Biden and other Democratic figures in election interference and conspiracies against Trump.

The article argues that social media giants like Twitter and Facebook are collaborating with political terrorist groups, particularly those associated with the DNC, to target and deplatform supporters of Donald Trump. It claims that these actions constitute cyber terrorism and are part of a broader strategy to purge political opponents. The article highlights the involvement of various organizations and individuals, including the Atlantic Council, Bellingcat, and Ukrainian Diaspora groups, in these efforts. It calls for massive class-action lawsuits against these social media companies and their collaborators, asserting that they are violating international and domestic laws.

The article argues that Antifa and BLM have ties to terrorist groups like ISIS, facilitated by the Obama-Biden administration and supported by the DNC. It claims that these groups are part of a broader strategy to introduce integral nationalism in the US, replacing democracy. The text also suggests that conservatives and centrists are the true enemies of these groups, as they oppose their political framework. The article links historical and current events to support its narrative, portraying left-wing groups and their supporters as orchestrating a coup against the presidency and undermining American values.

The article alleges that former President Barack Obama orchestrated a comprehensive Information Operation (IO) to manipulate public opinion and undermine both progressive Democrats and Donald Trump. It claims that Obama, along with the DNC and various government agencies, hired foreign operators and used perception management techniques to create deep-seated emotional responses among Americans, leading to a political divide and civil unrest. The text accuses multiple organizations, including Crowdstrike, the CIA, FBI, and various media and social media platforms, of colluding in these operations. It also suggests that the IO methods used in Ukraine were adapted for use in the U.S. to influence the 2016 election and subsequent political events, including Trump's impeachment. The article portrays Trump as a victim of these operations and criticizes the Democratic Party and its allies for their alleged roles in these activities.

The article alleges that the FBI, ODNI, and other US intelligence agencies were complicit in the DNC hack and 2016 election interference, working to hide the real hackers and protect corrupt activities. It claims that Ukrainian hackers, not Russian government operatives, were responsible for the DNC hack and that US intelligence agencies fabricated evidence to support a false narrative of Russian interference. The text criticizes various political figures and organizations, including Hillary Clinton, James Comey, and Robert Mueller, accusing them of corruption and criminal activities. It also highlights the involvement of Ukrainian cyber groups and their connections to US political operatives.

The article discusses an alleged deep state coup against the presidency of the United States, starting from 2012 and continuing through the 2016 election and beyond. It claims that cyber terrorists and information operations (IO) experts, particularly Joel Harding, have been manipulating media and public opinion to influence political outcomes. The narrative implicates various figures and organizations, including the US State Department, CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, ODNI, Ukrainian Diaspora, Atlantic Council, and Bellingcat, in a coordinated effort to undermine US democracy and provoke conflicts, particularly with Russia. The text is highly opinionated, presenting a far-right perspective on these events.

The article discusses the author's experiences with cyber terrorism, focusing on how private citizens and intelligence agents from foreign countries target American citizens, including journalists and their families. It highlights the involvement of various organizations like the NSA, CIA, FBI, ODNI, NATO, and private companies like Cambridge Analytica in these activities. The author calls for legislative changes to protect civilians from such cyber attacks and criticizes the current state of domestic surveillance and intelligence practices.

Victory Day 2019 in the Lugansk People’s Republic commemorates the region's historical and ongoing resistance against external aggressors, drawing parallels between WWII and the current conflict with Ukraine. The celebration highlights the sacrifices made by local heroes, both past and present, and underscores the region's commitment to integrating with Russia. The article criticizes Ukrainian leaders Poroshenko and Zelenskiy for their harsh policies towards the Donbass region, while praising the resilience and spirit of its people.

The article explores the paradox of nationalist Ukraine electing a Jewish president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in 2019. It delves into the historical and political context, highlighting the influence of nationalist groups like the OUN and the UNR on Ukrainian politics. The text criticizes the nationalist movements and their leaders, drawing parallels to historical figures and events. It also discusses the implications of Russia's passport policies in the Donbass region and the potential for further conflict. The article portrays Zelenskiy and other political figures negatively, suggesting a complex and contentious political landscape in Ukraine.

The 2019 Ukrainian presidential election, deemed illegitimate by international standards, reflects a rejection of nationalism and the 2014 Maidan revolution. The election saw Volodymyr Zelenskiy rise to power, backed by oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, signaling a potential return to pre-2014 corruption levels. The article criticizes the influence of nationalist figures like Stepan Bandera and the instability caused by nationalist politics. It highlights the dissatisfaction with former President Petro Poroshenko's leadership and the ongoing conflict in Donbass. The piece also discusses the challenges of press freedom and the legitimacy of the election process in Ukraine.

The article criticizes the reliance on Bellingcat, an investigative journalism group, by Western officials such as Kurt Volker, the U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations, for intelligence on the Kerch Strait incident between Ukraine and Russia. It alleges that Bellingcat is an extension of Ukrainian Intelligence and spreads propaganda, influencing U.S. and EU policies. The piece suggests that such reliance could lead to international conflict and questions the integrity of U.S. intelligence. It also accuses Ukrainian nationalist groups and diaspora organizations of financing Bellingcat and promoting neo-Nazi ideologies.

The Patriarchate of Constantinople's decision to grant the Ukrainian Orthodox Church independence from the Russian Orthodox Church is creating a significant schism in Christian history. This move, seen as political rather than ecclesiastical, has led to a lawsuit by the Turkish Orthodox Church and could result in a criminal trial for Patriarch Bartholomew. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church, supported by nationalist churches in the US and Canada, is portrayed as a nationalist political church, with leaders like Filaret being criticized for their schismatic actions. The article suggests that this religious independence is part of Ukraine's broader political strategy against Russia, with President Poroshenko using it to bolster his re-election campaign. The narrative also touches on the historical context of Ukrainian nationalism and its association with Nazi collaboration during WWII.

Credible allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee and Harvard Law School lecturer Brett Kavanaugh have raised significant concerns among students. They question whether Harvard Law School will address these allegations before allowing Kavanaugh to continue teaching, emphasizing the potential impact on female students' access to education. The article criticizes the administration for potentially prioritizing relationships with powerful jurists over student concerns and highlights the broader issue of sexual harassment allegations within the Supreme Court.

The article alleges that the Ukrainian hacking group Fancy Bear, often associated with Russian intelligence, has been working with Bellingcat and the Atlantic Council, undermining their credibility. It claims that these hackers, along with Ukrainian Intelligence and ultranationalist groups like Pravy Sektor, have fabricated evidence and manipulated geopolitical events, including the MH17 tragedy and the 2016 US presidential election. The text criticizes Eliot Higgins and Bellingcat for their alleged collaboration with these groups, questioning their independence and integrity.

The article criticizes Ohio Democrat Marci Kaptur for allegedly supporting ISIS and Nazi values, claiming she eulogized an ISIS member on C-SPAN and promotes reparations for families of WWII Nazi collaborators. It accuses Kaptur and other Congressional members of supporting illegal and immoral activities, including honoring ISIS terrorists. The piece also discusses the Ukrainian nationalist group OUNb and its alleged Nazi affiliations, criticizing Kaptur's association with them. The article is highly opinionated, with strong negative sentiments towards Kaptur, ISIS, and Ukrainian nationalist organizations.

The article discusses the influence and ambitions of Fethullah Gulen, a Turkish cleric who has been accused by the Turkish government of orchestrating a coup attempt. It portrays Gulen as a nationalist with a mission to create a Turkic Islamic World Order by influencing regions in Russia and China with significant Turkic populations. The article suggests that Gulen's rise to power was inadvertently supported by Turkish President Erdogan and that Gulen's network has extended deeply into Turkey's power structures. It also raises concerns about Gulen's activities in the United States, suggesting he has established a political organization akin to a government in exile. The article questions the legality and implications of hyphenated-Americans supporting Gulen's agenda against US interests and suggests a reevaluation of dual citizenship's role in the political landscape.

The article by GH Eliason discusses the influence of ethnic nationalist groups, such as the Albanian American Civic League (AACL), on US politics and their connection to Islamic terrorism. It critiques the Clinton administration's support for militant groups like the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) and the Muslim Brotherhood, drawing parallels to historical alliances during WWII. The author suggests that these relationships have led to increased terrorism and instability, particularly in the Balkans. The article also touches on the controversial role of the United States in the Arab Spring and the creation of ISIS-affiliated madrassas in Kosovo. It questions the ethics of US foreign policy that supports nationalist groups with histories of violence and genocide, and it challenges the Democratic National Convention delegates to reconsider their stance on these issues.