The article discusses the sinking of the Russian cruiser 'Moskva', the flagship of the Black Sea fleet, and the subsequent handling of information by Russian authorities. The exact number of casualties and the cause of the fire that led to the detonation of the ship's ammunition remain undisclosed by Russia, which is consistent with wartime practices and new laws against 'fake news'. The Russian Defense Ministry released a video showing the crew, but the number of survivors is unclear. Ukrainian and international media have reported the death of the cruiser's captain, Anton Kuprin, but he appears in the MOD video. There are reports of missing conscript soldiers, with families seeking information. The cruiser 'Moskva' was reportedly hit by Ukrainian Neptune missiles, a claim Russia has not confirmed. The loss of the cruiser is seen as a significant blow to Russia's image, but its impact on military operations in the region is debated. The article also touches on the broader context of the information war between Russia and Ukraine.

The article recounts the harrowing experiences of civilians, particularly Natalia Ivanova and her family, during the siege of Mariupol amidst the conflict between Russian and Ukrainian forces. It details their life in bomb shelters, the destruction of their home, and their eventual escape to St. Petersburg. The piece also touches on the controversial actions of Ukrainian troops, the survival of Mariupol zoo animals, and the differing perspectives of residents on who was responsible for the shelling. The author highlights the Russian narrative of avoiding civilian casualties and the Western media's reliance on Ukrainian sources for information on Mariupol. The article further describes the evacuation process, the challenges faced by refugees, and the personal story of Natalia's brother, Alexey, who joined the DPR militia in 2014. The piece ends with a reflection on the ongoing conflict and the uncertain future for those who have fled Mariupol.

The article discusses the significance of Victory Day in Russia, particularly in St. Petersburg, and how it is being affected by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It reflects on the historical importance of the day, marking the Soviet Union's victory over Nazi Germany, and the deep scars left by the Siege of Leningrad during World War II. The piece also examines the current societal divide in Russia due to the war in Ukraine, with many Russians questioning the costs and goals of the conflict. The article cites polls from VCIOM and the Levada Center, indicating President Putin's approval rating and the Russian public's concerns about the military campaign in Ukraine. The anticipation for Putin's speech on Victory Day is highlighted, with the expectation that it will be scrutinized for its ability to justify the ongoing military operation.

The article discusses the impact of international sanctions on Russia's IT sector, particularly focusing on Yandex, Russia's largest tech company. Due to the war with Ukraine, Russia has become the most sanctioned country, leading to a projected 10-15% GDP contraction and a potential 39% decline in IT spending. Yandex, often called the 'Russian Google', has seen its stock plummet and is facing challenges due to the suspension of trading on NYSE and Nasdaq, as well as the exodus of tech giants from Russia. Despite these setbacks, Yandex and other domestic tech firms like Sber, VK, and Ozon may benefit from reduced competition. The article also touches on Yandex's potential plans for international expansion and the challenges it faces in retaining a motivated workforce amidst the crisis.

The article reflects on the life and legacy of Mikhail Gorbachev, the last leader of the Soviet Union, following his death on August 30, 2022. Gorbachev is remembered for ending the Cold War and the arms race, and for his role in the dissolution of the Soviet Union. While he is celebrated internationally as a peace ambassador, his reputation in Russia is more complex and controversial. Russian President Vladimir Putin and other officials have expressed their views on Gorbachev's leadership, with some acknowledging his impact on history while others criticize the outcomes of his policies. The article includes reactions from various Russian figures, including politicians, journalists, and a musician, highlighting the diverse perspectives on Gorbachev's contributions to Russia and the world.

The article reflects on the Siege of Leningrad during WWII and draws parallels with the current conflict in Ukraine. It recounts the harrowing experiences of survivors like Valentina Kolesnikova, who was a child during the siege. The article criticizes the comparison made by Western and Ukrainian press between the Siege of Leningrad and the destruction in Ukrainian cities, noting that the defenders of Leningrad and Mariupol employed different tactics. It also discusses the evacuation of civilians during the siege, contrasting it with reports of Ukrainian forces preventing civilians from leaving Mariupol. The piece touches on the use of WWII history in Russian schools and the narrative of fighting against a resurgence of Nazism in Ukraine. The article suggests that unlike during WWII, many Russians today are uncertain about the enemy and the reasons for the war.

The article discusses the missile strike on a train station in Kramatorsk, Ukraine, which resulted in civilian casualties. The attack was initially blamed on Russia, but Russia denied responsibility, suggesting the missile belonged to Ukrainian forces. The article examines the evidence and arguments from both sides, including the serial number of the missile, the direction of the launch, and the history of Tochka-U missile usage by both countries. It also touches on the broader context of the conflict, including the impact on children and the role of media and social media in reporting and shaping perceptions of the war. The article concludes that without undeniable evidence, it is not possible to definitively assign blame for the attack.

The article covers the funeral of 12-year-old Katya Kutubaeva and her grandmother in Donetsk, amidst ongoing missile shelling. Katya, her grandmother, and her ballet tutor were killed by a missile strike, which local authorities attribute to Ukrainian artillery. The article criticizes the international media for selective reporting on civilian casualties in the Ukraine conflict, highlighting that deaths caused by Ukrainian or NATO-supplied missiles receive less attention. It also discusses the use of PFM-1 anti-personnel mines, known as 'petal' mines, in Donetsk, which have caused civilian injuries and deaths. The article suggests that the international media and organizations have largely ignored or misreported the use of these mines and the resulting casualties. The author implies that the narrative of the conflict is distorted by journalists who are not on the ground and lack local knowledge.

The article discusses the Russian military's withdrawal from Kherson, a significant strategic and symbolic setback for Moscow. Despite Russia's initial capture of Kherson without a fight and promises to never leave, Ukrainian forces are now poised to retake the city with minimal resistance. The decision to retreat was made public through a televised military meeting, where Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu ordered the withdrawal based on General Sergey Surovikin's recommendation. The absence of President Vladimir Putin from this announcement was noted. The article explores the military rationale behind the retreat, the potential consequences for the Russian military, and the impact on local residents who may now face persecution by Ukrainian forces. It also touches on the broader implications for Russia's geopolitical strategy and the domestic perception of the conflict. The article includes various reactions from military bloggers, political analysts, and key Russian figures, reflecting a mix of support, criticism, and speculation about the decision to withdraw from Kherson.

Alexei Navalny, a prominent Kremlin critic, died in a high-security penal colony, sparking international reactions. Despite his global popularity, Navalny faced significant opposition in Russia. His Anti-Corruption Foundation, known for exposing corruption among Russian elites, was designated as an extremist organization. Navalny's death coincided with significant geopolitical events, including Ukraine's military actions and a US congressional vote on aid to Ukraine. His wife, Yulia Navalnaya, vowed to continue his work. The article highlights the complexities of Russian politics and the challenges faced by opposition figures.