In Ecuador, a voting certificate is a crucial document required for various transactions, from bank loans to university enrollment. Despite the lack of a legal framework mandating its presentation, public and private entities continue to request it. The practice, deeply rooted in Ecuadorian customs, persists even though recent laws and presidential decisions have aimed to eliminate such requirements. The voting certificate, which confirms participation in elections, has been a part of Ecuadorian civil processes since 1947 and is considered a minor electoral infraction if not requested by institutions.

Gonzalo Muñoz criticizes the National Assembly of Ecuador for procedural errors in presenting a political trial against the President, arguing that the accusations lack logical connection and are outrageous. The Assembly confused articles of the Constitution in their submission, which Muñoz sees as undermining the seriousness of the process. He explains that the accusations must be specific and fall within the causes established by the Constitution. Muñoz believes that the Constitutional Court should thoroughly analyze the connection between the accusations and the political offenses to find serious flaws in the accusation. He also discusses the potential consequences of the Court's decision and the President's ability to dissolve the Assembly, refuting claims that the political trial would prevent this.

On February 9, Enrique Pita of the Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE) reported the discovery of a parallel computing center in a warehouse at the CNE's Guayas headquarters in Guayaquil, which allegedly printed unauthorized recount forms to influence the referendum results. Diana Atamaint, CNE president, confirmed a complaint was filed with the Fiscalía. The recount process in Guayas was halted, and the CNE's Guayas director, John Gamboa, denied the allegations. The Partido Social Cristiano demanded an explanation, while Leonidas Iza of CONAIE suggested the complaint might be a distraction. The Revolución Ciudadana reported that their computing center was interfered with, and their computers were seized by the Fiscalía. Atamaint announced Gamboa's removal and the resumption of the scrutiny process.

Álvaro Román, a lawyer with over 30 years of experience in criminal and constitutional law, faced a dispute over the presidency of Ecuador's Consejo de la Judicatura following María del Carmen Maldonado's resignation. Despite being her alternate, the CPCCS initially decided he could not assume the presidency. However, after the Corte Constitucional's ruling on September 22, 2022, and the subsequent removal of the CPCCS members for non-compliance, Román was positioned to become president. His academic background includes a Doctorate in Jurisprudence and a Master's in Constitutional Law from Universidad Central, as well as teaching roles at several universities.

Luz Elena Coloma, a candidate for mayor of Quito with the support of the Alianza Va por Ti coalition, which includes CREO, Construye, Reto, and Ahora, discussed her campaign, political alliances, and gender parity in municipal institutions. She mentioned past efforts to ensure parity and the current state of the Municipality of Quito. Coloma also addressed the financing of her campaign and her potential relationship with the President of the Republic.

The article criticizes the Ecuadorian government, particularly President Guillermo Lasso, Interior Minister Juan Zapata, and Secretary of Communication Andrés Seminario, for their lack of appropriate response to the violence in Guayas and Esmeraldas. It highlights the government's preoccupation with media portrayal and personal grievances over addressing the critical issue of public safety. The article underscores the contrast between the festive reception of the FIFA World Cup trophy and the grim reality of violence in the country, questioning the government's priorities during a crisis.

Michael Fitzpatrick, the U.S. ambassador, discussed the revocation of over 300 visas for Ecuadorians linked to corruption and other crimes. The U.S. Embassy enforces strict adherence to U.S. laws and norms, which includes denying visas to those who fall outside acceptable conduct. The revocations are part of efforts to support Ecuador and other countries in combating corruption, drug trafficking, and violence. Fitzpatrick highlighted the cooperation with Ecuadorian institutions in various areas, including justice, police, and fiscal policy, and mentioned international investigations and information exchange agreements. The ambassador emphasized the ongoing collaboration with the Ecuadorian government and society to strengthen public institutions and improve security and transparency.

Ecuador has been experiencing protests for 10 days, led by Leonidas Iza, president of the Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador (CONAIE), with demands including freezing fuel prices and addressing indigenous communities' grievances. President Guillermo Lasso agreed to dialogue after civil society calls, but tensions escalated with police actions against protesters. The violence has resulted in at least two deaths, and both the government and protest leaders are urged to negotiate to prevent further violence. Indigenous populations have historically been marginalized, and the current protests reflect deep societal fractures and the need for mutual concessions in a democratic framework.

Ecuadorian President Lasso partially vetoed a law regarding abortion in cases of rape, reducing the timeframe for termination from 18 to 12 weeks for minors and rural women, and proposing the law be named to reflect regulation rather than guaranteeing abortion. He insists on respecting the Constitutional Court's ruling despite personal disagreement. Lita Martínez of Cepam Guayaquil criticized the veto for ignoring the realities faced by rape victims. The veto also requires a report, sworn statement, or medical exam as a prerequisite for abortion, which contradicts the Court's ruling that suggested flexibility in requirements. Constitutional lawyer Mauricio Maldonado argues that the right to abortion in cases of rape is legally sound and that the President's objections are more symbolic than substantive.