Mexico plans to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Texas's Permian Basin for the first time this year, but the Biden administration's pause on new export permits has cast uncertainty over the nascent industry. The Department of Energy's decision to halt permits for LNG terminals in Mexico pending economic and environmental reviews has affected several projects on Mexico's Pacific and Gulf coasts. Environmental advocates in Mexico welcome the pause, citing concerns over the country's reliance on U.S. natural gas and the climate impacts of LNG exports. However, industry stakeholders worry about the potential deterrent effect on investors. The article highlights the complex interplay between regulatory scrutiny, environmental advocacy, and the economic ambitions of the LNG sector in Mexico and the U.S.

In West Texas, abandoned oil and water wells are causing environmental disasters, such as the massive saltwater spill on Bill Wight's ranch following a well explosion. The Texas Railroad Commission, responsible for regulating the oil and gas sector, has been criticized for its inconsistent response to such incidents. Despite a lack of records for many wells, the commission has allocated millions for plugging orphan wells, with additional federal funds from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Groundwater districts and landowners have struggled with the commission over well-plugging responsibilities, especially for undocumented wells. The urgency to address these wells has grown as they threaten groundwater supplies and the environment. Scientists and regulators are investigating the causes of leaks and blowouts, with some research suggesting links to saltwater injection wells from fracking. The commission's prioritization system for plugging wells has been questioned, and there is a push for more comprehensive monitoring and research to prevent future disasters.

Abandoned oil and water wells in West Texas are causing significant environmental damage, including a recent explosion on Bill Wight's ranch that released saltwater, decimating the soil. The Texas Railroad Commission, responsible for regulating the oil and gas sector, has been criticized for its inconsistent approach to plugging these wells. Despite receiving federal and state funds for well plugging, the commission faces challenges due to undocumented wells and disputes over responsibility. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law has provided additional funding, but the urgency to address these environmental hazards remains high. Researchers are investigating the causes of these blowouts, with some linking them to saltwater injection wells used in fracking. The situation underscores the need for improved monitoring and regulatory actions to prevent further environmental damage.

Abandoned oil and water wells in West Texas are causing environmental disasters, such as the massive saltwater spill on Bill Wight's ranch, which decimated the soil. The Texas Railroad Commission, responsible for regulating the oil and gas sector, has been criticized for its uneven approach to plugging these orphan wells. Despite a lack of documentation, the commission spent $2.5 million to plug the well on Wight's property. Texas has received federal funds to address the issue, but the problem is exacerbated by thousands of undocumented wells. Scientists and regulators are investigating the causes of these leaks and blowouts, with some research suggesting they may be related to saltwater injection wells used in fracking. The situation underscores the challenges of managing old drilling sites and the risks they pose to groundwater and the environment.

Leaking and exploding abandoned oil wells in West Texas are causing significant environmental damage, with saltwater flooding particularly affecting the Permian Basin. The Railroad Commission is noted for its swift response, but experts remain perplexed about the causes of these blowouts, highlighting the ongoing challenges in managing abandoned wells.

Texas companies have been circumventing federal environmental laws by classifying large facilities as smaller ones to avoid stricter pollution standards and public input. The Intercontinental Terminals Company, among others, obtained permits for emissions just under the EPA's threshold, thereby not subjecting their facilities to New Source Review. This practice, which is systemic in Texas, is facilitated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and is not adequately challenged by the Environmental Protection Agency. The Environmental Integrity Project and other watchdogs have documented numerous cases where companies exploit legal loopholes or underestimate pollution to obtain minor source permits for what are effectively major sources of pollution. This has led to significant environmental and public health concerns, with little recourse for affected communities.

Texas companies, such as the Intercontinental Terminals Company, have been exploiting legal loopholes to classify large facilities as smaller ones to avoid stringent environmental regulations and public input. This practice, which involves obtaining permits for 'minor' sources of pollution when the facilities are actually 'major' sources, has been facilitated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and has largely gone unchecked by the Environmental Protection Agency. The article details several cases where companies have used tactics like underestimating emissions, classifying emissions in unregulated categories, and using retroactive amendments to avoid stricter pollution controls. This systemic issue has led to increased emissions and has been criticized by attorneys and regulatory experts, highlighting the need for more stringent oversight and enforcement of environmental laws in Texas.

Texas companies are reportedly exploiting regulatory loopholes to classify large facilities as smaller ones, thereby circumventing stricter environmental rules and reducing public input. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is criticized for permitting such practices, which include 'sham permits' and 'synthetic minor' labels. Cases at ITC, GAF, Freeport LNG, and Max Midstream exemplify these issues. The EPA has stepped in regarding seawater desalination at the Port of Corpus Christi. The article also discusses 'upset' emissions and the case of Exxon Baytown.

Texas companies are exploiting legal loopholes to classify large pollution sources as minor to avoid stringent environmental regulations and public input. Tactics include underestimating emissions, using retroactive amendments, and dividing facilities into separate minor sources. This systemic issue is facilitated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and lacks sufficient intervention from the Environmental Protection Agency. Examples include Intercontinental Terminals Company's tank farm expansion, Freeport LNG's gas liquefaction plant, and Max Midstream's Seahawk oil terminal. Environmental advocates and organizations like the Environmental Integrity Project and the Center for Biological Diversity are challenging these practices through legal action and petitions to the EPA.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are opposing the construction of the Saguaro natural gas pipeline, which they see as a threat to their safety and environment. The pipeline, proposed by ONEOK, would transport gas from the Permian Basin to Mexico, where it would be liquefied for export. Concerns include the town's emergency response capabilities, potential land expropriation, and the environmental impact. Environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen are also critical, citing the project's conflict with climate goals. Despite some regulatory approvals, local and environmental advocates continue to push for rerouting or canceling the project.

Texas companies are circumventing federal environmental laws by exploiting loopholes and lax state permitting processes, often with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's (TCEQ) facilitation. Tactics include misclassifying major pollution sources as minor, underestimating emissions, and using retroactive amendments to alter permits. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been criticized for not intervening in Texas' noncompliance with federal standards. Specific cases involve companies like Intercontinental Terminals Company, GAF, and ExxonMobil, with community advocates and environmental groups challenging the TCEQ's decisions. Despite systemic issues and rare victories, the fight against these practices continues, with some looking for new approaches to enforce environmental laws.

A small town in West Texas is challenging the planned Saguaro cross-border natural gas pipeline due to safety concerns and potential impacts on the local community. The pipeline, which has international implications, has sparked local protests and raised questions about the state's involvement and the environmental consequences.

Residents of Van Horn, a small West Texas town, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to the U.S.-Mexico border. The community, primarily Hispanic with a median income of about half the state median, fears the pipeline's safety risks and the use of eminent domain for its construction. Environmental groups like the Sierra Club argue the project lacks sufficient federal oversight and contradicts the Biden administration's climate goals. Despite these concerns, the pipeline has received a construction permit from the Texas Railroad Commission and support from the U.S. Department of State. Advocacy groups and residents are pressing for the pipeline to be rerouted or canceled, citing potential environmental and safety impacts.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to Mexico. Concerns include safety risks, eminent domain issues, and environmental impacts. The pipeline has received permits from state and federal agencies, but local residents and environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen are pushing for more scrutiny and potential rerouting. The project is seen as conflicting with the Biden administration's climate goals. Local officials and advocacy groups continue to seek ways to voice their opposition and protect their community.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are rallying against the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to the U.S.-Mexico border. Concerns include safety risks, environmental impact, and the use of eminent domain to seize land. The pipeline has received support from the U.S. Department of State but faces opposition from local residents and environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen. The project is criticized for its potential contribution to climate change and lack of federal oversight. Advocacy groups are pushing for more scrutiny and possible rerouting or cancellation of the pipeline.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to the U.S.-Mexico border. Concerns include safety, environmental impact, and the use of eminent domain to seize land. The pipeline, which would connect to another in Mexico for export to Asia and South America, has received support from the U.S. Department of State but faces opposition from local residents and environmental groups like the Sierra Club. Critics argue the project contradicts the Biden administration's climate goals and lacks sufficient federal oversight. Local officials and advocacy groups are pressing for more scrutiny and potential rerouting of the pipeline.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to Mexico. Concerns include safety, environmental impact, and the use of eminent domain to seize land. The pipeline has received support from the U.S. Department of State and the Texas Railroad Commission, but faces opposition from local residents, environmental groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen, and Mexican environmental organizations. The project is seen as conflicting with the Biden administration's climate goals and has sparked calls for more federal scrutiny and rerouting.

Produced water spills from oil and gas operations in Texas have caused significant environmental damage, contaminating groundwater, killing wildlife, and affecting property. The Railroad Commission of Texas has been criticized for its lax regulations and inadequate response to spills. Despite ongoing remediation efforts, the problem persists, with spills continuing to impact land and water resources. Lawsuits from affected landowners highlight the severe consequences of these spills, while experts call for better reporting and long-term monitoring to mitigate the damage.

Midland, Texas, is challenging Pilot Water Solutions' permits to inject oil and gas wastewater near the T-Bar Ranch, a critical water supply source for the city. The Railroad Commission of Texas has granted Midland standing to contest the permits, with a hearing scheduled for January. The case underscores the tension between the need for wastewater disposal and the protection of freshwater resources. Midland Mayor Lori Blong and other city officials express concerns about potential groundwater contamination, despite Pilot's assurances of safety measures. The issue is part of broader challenges in West Texas, including water scarcity and the environmental impact of oil and gas operations.

Midland, Texas, is challenging Pilot Water Solutions' permits to inject oil and gas wastewater near the T-Bar Ranch, a critical water supply for the city. The Railroad Commission of Texas has granted Midland standing to contest the permits, with a hearing scheduled for January. The case underscores the dual challenges of managing toxic wastewater and securing freshwater in West Texas. Midland officials, including Mayor Lori Blong, express concerns about potential groundwater contamination despite Pilot's assurances of safety measures. The issue is further complicated by the region's history of water scarcity and the increasing scrutiny of disposal wells due to seismic risks.

Midland is actively opposing the disposal of oilfield wastewater near its drinking water supply, highlighting the tension between the demand for water and the need for disposal sites. The waste disposal industry is under scrutiny due to the potential for accidents and environmental risks.

Midland, Texas, is challenging permits for Pilot Water Solutions to inject oil and gas wastewater near its T-Bar Ranch, a critical water supply. The Railroad Commission of Texas has granted Midland standing to contest the permits, with a hearing set for January. The case underscores the tension between water needs and wastewater disposal in West Texas. Midland Mayor Lori Blong and Pilot Water Solutions' Zachary Neal present opposing views on the safety and necessity of the disposal wells. Experts highlight the risks of contamination and the evolving regulatory landscape, with increased scrutiny on disposal wells due to environmental concerns and seismic activity.

Midland, Texas, is challenging Pilot Water Solutions' permits to inject oil and gas wastewater near the T-Bar Ranch, a critical water supply for the city. The Railroad Commission of Texas has granted Midland standing to contest the permits, with a hearing scheduled for January. The case underscores the tension between the need for wastewater disposal and the protection of freshwater resources. Midland officials, including Mayor Lori Blong, emphasize the importance of safeguarding groundwater, while Pilot Water Solutions asserts that their proposed wells exceed regulatory safety requirements. The dispute highlights broader issues in West Texas regarding water scarcity and the environmental impact of oil and gas operations.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of toxic produced water, causing significant environmental damage and legal disputes. The Railroad Commission's inconsistent reporting and enforcement have led to incomplete records and inadequate remediation. Companies like Enhanced Midstream, Texcel Exploration, and Occidental Petroleum are implicated in major spills, while others like Apache and Chevron face criticism for their handling of incidents. The article underscores the need for stricter regulations and better enforcement to protect land and water resources.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of toxic wastewater, known as produced water, over the past decade, with significant environmental and economic impacts. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating these activities, has been criticized for poor record-keeping, ambiguous rules, and inadequate enforcement. Major spills have contaminated water sources, killed livestock, and rendered land barren. Despite some remediation efforts, many spills go unreported or inadequately addressed. The article highlights the need for stricter regulations and better enforcement to protect the environment and public health.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of produced water, a toxic byproduct of drilling, causing significant environmental damage. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating these activities, has been criticized for poor record-keeping and lack of enforcement. Major spills have contaminated water sources and land, leading to lawsuits and environmental degradation. Despite some remediation efforts, the problem persists, with regulatory ambiguities and inconsistent reporting standards exacerbating the issue. Investigative reporting by Inside Climate News highlights the scale and impact of these spills, calling for more stringent regulations and enforcement.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of wastewater. The Railroad Commission's rules on produced water spills are vague, and company policies vary. The Railroad Commission's spill response protocol is also highlighted.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have reported over 10,000 spills totaling more than 148 million gallons of produced water from 2013 to 2022, with only about 40% recovered. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating the industry, has not formally adopted guidelines for reporting and cleaning up spills, leading to inconsistent reporting and enforcement. Large spills have caused significant environmental damage, including contamination of water sources and land, and have affected local residents and livestock. The Railroad Commission's lack of clear rules and enforcement has led to confusion among companies and inadequate responses to spills. The issue is compounded by the vast amounts of wastewater generated by fracking, and the state's limited number of inspectors is insufficient to oversee the industry's compliance.

Texas oil and gas companies have spilled millions of gallons of produced water, a toxic byproduct of drilling, over the past decade. Despite regulations, inconsistent reporting and enforcement by the Railroad Commission of Texas have obscured the true extent of these spills. Analysis by Inside Climate News revealed over 10,000 spills totaling more than 148 million gallons, with only 40% of the spilled water recovered. The spills have caused significant environmental damage, including contaminated water sources and barren land. Legal actions have been taken by affected residents, but regulatory responses have been inconsistent. The article highlights the need for clearer regulations and better enforcement to mitigate the environmental impact of produced water spills.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of produced water, a toxic byproduct of drilling, over the past decade. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating these activities, has been criticized for its vague rules and poor enforcement, leading to inconsistent reporting and remediation of spills. Major companies like Apache, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum have been implicated in significant spills, causing environmental damage and legal disputes. Investigative efforts by Inside Climate News revealed the extent of these spills and the regulatory shortcomings, highlighting the need for more stringent oversight and remediation practices.

Texas oil and gas wells generate billions of gallons of toxic produced water, leading to frequent spills. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulation, has ambiguous rules and poor record-keeping, resulting in underreported and inadequately addressed spills. Over a decade, more than 10,000 spills totaling over 148 million gallons were reported, with only 40% of the spilled water recovered. Major spills have caused significant environmental damage, including contaminated water sources and poisoned livestock. Regulatory failures and inconsistent company practices exacerbate the issue, with some companies not reporting spills at all. The article highlights the need for stricter regulations and better enforcement to mitigate the environmental impact of produced water spills.

The Texas oil industry's practice of flaring, or burning off natural gas at the wellhead, is under scrutiny due to its environmental impact. Despite State Rule 32 prohibiting flaring except under specific conditions, the Railroad Commission has granted numerous exceptions, often with little evidence that companies tried to prevent flaring. Commissioner Jim Wright criticized Callon Petroleum for its flaring practices but voted to grant them a permit for continued flaring. Advocates argue that the permit process is a rubber stamp, rendering the anti-flaring rule ineffective. The Environmental Protection Agency is finalizing methane regulations, but currently, a patchwork of state regulations governs flaring. The Railroad Commission claims to enforce the flaring rule strictly, but the high approval rate of exceptions suggests otherwise. Flaring contributes to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and has been linked to health issues. Efforts to reduce flaring are ongoing, but advocates call for more decisive action and enforcement.

The Texas Railroad Commission continues to issue thousands of flaring permits, allowing companies like Callon Petroleum to burn off natural gas despite environmental concerns. Critics argue that the permit process is too lenient, effectively nullifying anti-flaring regulations. Flaring contributes to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, with methane being a significant climate change driver. Advocacy groups call for stricter enforcement and reduced oil and gas production to mitigate flaring. The Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize new methane regulations, but state-level enforcement remains inconsistent.

Residents of Van Horn, a small town in West Texas, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to the U.S.-Mexico border. Concerns include safety risks, eminent domain issues, and the project's alignment with federal climate goals. Environmental advocacy groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen are pushing for more federal oversight, while local residents feel ignored by distant regulators. The pipeline, developed by ONEOK, has received some federal and state approvals but faces ongoing opposition from community members and environmentalists.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is criticized for allowing companies to evade federal environmental laws by misclassifying major pollution sources as minor, thereby avoiding stringent regulations. The article highlights systemic issues in Texas' emissions permitting, with companies like Intercontinental Terminals Company, GAF, Freeport LNG, Max Midstream, Chevron, Scout Energy Management, and ExxonMobil exploiting legal loopholes. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also criticized for its lack of intervention. Environmental and public interest groups continue to challenge these practices, but face significant obstacles.

Mexico is struggling to meet its water delivery obligations to the United States under a 1944 treaty, exacerbated by climate change and local agricultural demands. The situation has led to tensions between local farmers in Chihuahua and the federal government, with past protests and potential future conflicts looming. Both countries are negotiating to find a sustainable solution, but the challenges of reduced water availability and diplomatic pressures complicate the issue. Key stakeholders include local farmers, environmentalists, and government officials from both nations.

Tensions are escalating in the Rio Grande Basin due to Mexico's delayed water deliveries to the U.S., as required by a 1944 treaty. The situation is exacerbated by climate change, drought, and political provocations. Chihuahua's farmers, who rely on water from the La Boquilla dam, are urging the Mexican government to find alternative ways to fulfill the treaty without depleting their reservoirs. Environmentalists and scientists are calling for a transition to less water-intensive agriculture. The U.S. and Mexico are negotiating a new treaty addendum to ensure reliable water deliveries before the current cycle ends in 2025. Texas politicians have expressed concerns over Mexico's compliance, while Mexican officials are considering using other reservoirs for treaty obligations. The International Boundary and Water Commission oversees the treaty's implementation, with both countries seeking cooperative strategies to manage the diminishing water resources.

Residents of Van Horn, Texas, are challenging the proposed Saguaro Connector Pipeline, which would transport natural gas from the Permian Basin to the U.S.-Mexico border. Concerns include safety risks, eminent domain land seizures, and environmental impacts. Advocacy groups like the Sierra Club and Public Citizen argue for greater regulatory scrutiny, while federal and state agencies have shown support for the project. The pipeline's construction would significantly impact the local community and environment, with potential international ramifications.

Texas oil and gas companies have spilled millions of gallons of toxic produced water, with over 10,000 spills reported between 2013 and 2022. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating these activities, has been criticized for poor record-keeping and lack of enforcement. Major spills have caused significant environmental damage, including contaminated water sources and barren land. Despite guidelines drafted in 2009, the Commission has not formally adopted rules for reporting and cleaning up these spills, leading to inconsistent reporting and remediation efforts. Various companies and regulatory bodies have been involved in addressing these issues, but significant challenges remain in managing and mitigating the environmental impact of produced water spills.

Oil and gas companies in Texas have spilled millions of gallons of produced water, a toxic byproduct of drilling, over the past decade. The Railroad Commission of Texas, responsible for regulating these activities, has been criticized for poor record-keeping and lack of enforcement. Major spills have caused significant environmental damage, including contaminated water sources and poisoned livestock. Despite guidelines drafted in 2009, the commission has not adopted formal rules for reporting and cleaning up these spills, leading to inconsistent reporting and remediation efforts. Various companies, including Apache, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum, have been involved in significant spills, with some facing lawsuits from affected landowners. The Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies have occasionally intervened, but the overall regulatory framework remains inadequate.

Tensions are escalating in the Rio Grande Basin as Mexico falls behind in its water delivery obligations to the U.S. under a 1944 treaty. The situation is exacerbated by climate change, drought, and political provocations. Local farmers in Chihuahua are protesting the potential release of water to the U.S., fearing it will deplete their resources. The U.S. and Mexico are negotiating to ensure reliable water deliveries before the current cycle ends in 2025. The International and Boundary and Water Commission is working on a treaty addendum to expand water supplies. The situation is further complicated by illegal logging, climate change, and political actions such as Texas Governor Greg Abbott's installation of buoys in the Rio Grande.

Over a decade, oil and gas companies in Texas reported over 10,000 spills of produced water, totaling more than 148 million gallons, with only 40% recovered. The spills, ranging from minor leaks to massive incidents, have caused significant environmental damage, including contaminated water sources and poisoned cattle. The Railroad Commission's inconsistent and vague regulations have led to underreporting and inadequate remediation. Companies like Vista Energy Consulting, Enhanced Midstream, and Texcel Exploration are involved in major spills, while regulatory bodies like the EPA and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality have intervened in some cases. The article underscores the need for stricter regulations and better enforcement to mitigate the environmental impact of produced water spills.

The Texas oil industry faces scrutiny over its flaring practices, with the Railroad Commission granting numerous exceptions to State Rule 32, which prohibits flaring except under specific conditions. Despite Commissioner Jim Wright's criticism of Callon Petroleum for excessive flaring, the company continues to receive permits. Flaring contributes significantly to local air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, with methane being a potent climate change agent. Advocacy groups like Commission Shift and Oilfield Witness call for stricter regulations and enforcement to curb flaring and its environmental impact.

The Texas oil industry faces scrutiny over its flaring practices, with the Railroad Commission granting numerous exceptions to State Rule 32, which prohibits flaring except under specific conditions. Callon Petroleum, a major player, has been criticized for excessive flaring, despite regulatory comments urging better solutions. Advocacy groups argue that the permit process is too lenient, effectively nullifying the anti-flaring rule. Methane emissions from flaring contribute significantly to climate change and local air pollution, raising health concerns. The Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize new methane regulations, but state-level enforcement remains inconsistent.

The Texas oil industry's flaring practices, particularly by Callon Petroleum, have come under scrutiny for contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Despite regulations, the Railroad Commission frequently grants flaring exceptions, leading to criticism from environmental advocates. Commissioner Jim Wright has expressed concerns but continues to approve permits. The Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize methane regulations, while state-level rules remain inconsistent. Advocacy groups call for stricter enforcement and reforms to reduce flaring and its environmental impact.

The Texas Observer reports on the ongoing issue of natural gas flaring in Texas, highlighting the state's Railroad Commission's leniency in granting flaring permits despite environmental concerns. Commissioner Jim Wright criticized Callon Petroleum for excessive flaring but still voted to grant permits. Advocacy groups argue that the permit process undermines anti-flaring rules, contributing to local air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The article underscores the need for stricter enforcement and regulatory reforms to address the environmental impact of flaring.

The Texas oil industry's flaring practices, particularly by Callon Petroleum, have come under scrutiny for contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Despite State Rule 32 prohibiting flaring except under specific conditions, the Railroad Commission has granted numerous exceptions, often criticized as lenient. Commissioner Jim Wright has voiced concerns but continues to approve permits. Advocacy groups like Commission Shift and Oilfield Witness call for stricter regulations and enforcement. The Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize methane regulations, but current state regulations remain inconsistent. The article highlights the environmental and health impacts of flaring and the need for more stringent oversight.

The Texas oil industry's flaring practices, particularly by Callon Petroleum, have come under scrutiny for contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Despite regulations, the Railroad Commission frequently grants flaring permits, often criticized as a 'rubber stamp' process. Advocacy groups and experts call for stricter enforcement and reforms to reduce flaring and its environmental impact. The article highlights the tension between regulatory bodies, industry practices, and environmental advocacy.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is under scrutiny for allegedly allowing companies to evade stringent federal environmental regulations by misclassifying major pollution sources as minor ones. This practice, which has been criticized by environmental attorneys and regulatory experts, enables companies to bypass the more rigorous permitting process required by the Clean Air Act. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also been criticized for its lack of intervention in Texas' permitting practices. The article highlights several cases where companies have exploited legal loopholes to avoid stricter pollution controls, leading to significant environmental and public health concerns.

Tensions are escalating in Chihuahua, Mexico, over the 1944 water treaty with the United States as drought and climate change exacerbate water shortages. Local farmers and officials are concerned about the federal government's potential decision to share water with the U.S., fearing it will deplete local reservoirs. The situation recalls the 2020 protests when farmers clashed with the National Guard over similar issues. The U.S. and Mexico are negotiating to ensure water deliveries before the current five-year cycle ends in 2025, but distrust and political tensions complicate the process. Experts emphasize the need for sustainable water management and cooperation between the two countries to address the ongoing crisis.

The article investigates how major polluters in Texas, such as the Intercontinental Terminals Company, exploit legal loopholes to evade stringent federal environmental laws. It highlights systemic issues within the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which allegedly facilitate these practices. The report includes multiple cases where companies mischaracterize their pollution levels to avoid major source permits, leading to significant environmental harm. Key figures like Gabriel Clark-Leach and Ryan Maher criticize the regulatory framework, while the TCEQ and EPA provide limited responses to the allegations.

The Texas oil industry's practice of flaring natural gas has come under scrutiny, with the Railroad Commission granting numerous exceptions to the anti-flaring rule, State Rule 32. Despite criticism from Commissioner Jim Wright, the commission continues to approve permits for companies like Callon Petroleum, which has been allowed to flare gas at the Crockett 15 well for seven years. Flaring contributes to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and while the industry claims to be working on reducing flaring, advocates argue that the commission's high approval rate for exceptions indicates a lack of effective regulation. The Environmental Protection Agency is working on finalizing methane regulations, but currently, state regulations vary. Studies and advocates call for more stringent enforcement and transparency in the permitting process to address the environmental impacts of flaring.

The Texas oil industry's flaring practices, particularly by Callon Petroleum, have come under scrutiny for their environmental impact and regulatory leniency. Despite State Rule 32 prohibiting flaring except under specific conditions, the Railroad Commission has granted numerous exceptions, often criticized as a 'rubber stamp' process. Commissioner Jim Wright has voiced concerns but continues to approve permits. Advocacy groups like Commission Shift and Oilfield Witness call for stricter enforcement and regulatory reforms. Methane emissions from flaring contribute significantly to climate change, with the oil and gas industry being a major source. The Environmental Protection Agency is set to finalize new methane regulations, but state-level enforcement remains inconsistent.

The Texas oil industry's flaring practices, particularly by Callon Petroleum, are under scrutiny for contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Despite regulations, the Railroad Commission frequently grants flaring exceptions, leading to criticism from environmental advocates. Commissioner Jim Wright has expressed concerns but continues to approve permits. The Environmental Protection Agency is finalizing methane regulations, while state-level rules remain inconsistent. Advocacy groups call for stricter enforcement and reduced flaring to mitigate environmental impact.

Texas' environmental agency is enabling increased disposal of oilfield wastewater into rivers, raising concerns among environmental advocates and scientists. Despite the presence of toxic substances in the wastewater, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is encouraging companies to apply for discharge permits. Critics argue that the practice is economically and technologically unproven and lacks thorough risk assessments. The article discusses the potential environmental and health risks, regulatory gaps, and ongoing research efforts to address these issues.

Texas' environmental agency has granted authority to permit the discharge of produced water from oilfields into rivers, raising concerns about potential fracking wastewater discharges in arid West Texas. This decision is moving forward despite the lack of comprehensive scientific research on the environmental impacts.

Texas' environmental agency is enabling companies to increase the disposal of oilfield wastewater into rivers, despite concerns from researchers and environmental advocates about the potential health and environmental risks. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is encouraging oil and gas companies to apply for discharge permits, even though studies indicate that produced water contains harmful chemicals and toxins. Critics argue that the state is moving forward without thorough risk assessments and adequate regulatory standards. The article highlights the ongoing debate between economic interests and environmental safety, with various stakeholders including researchers, environmental groups, and industry representatives weighing in on the issue.

Texas regulators are moving forward with plans to allow increased discharges of oilfield wastewater into rivers, despite concerns from environmental advocates and scientists about the potential health and environmental risks. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is encouraging companies to apply for discharge permits, even though studies indicate that produced water contains harmful chemicals and toxins. Critics argue that the state is acting hastily without thorough risk assessments, while proponents see it as a necessary step in managing wastewater in a water-stressed region. The debate highlights the tension between economic interests and environmental protection.

Texas is moving forward with permits to discharge oilfield wastewater into rivers despite incomplete risk assessments and concerns from scientists and environmental advocates. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is encouraging companies to apply for permits, even though the state's water quality standards do not cover many toxic constituents found in produced water. Researchers and environmental groups are calling for more comprehensive testing and stricter regulations. The practice has raised concerns about potential health and environmental impacts, particularly in water-stressed regions like the Permian Basin.

Texas regulators are moving forward with allowing increased discharges of oilfield wastewater, known as produced water, from conventional drilling and fracking into water bodies without comprehensive risk assessments. Despite containing toxins and sometimes toxic drilling chemicals, permits rely on self-reporting by companies. Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi researchers found permits allowed 700 million gallons annually of untreated wastewater to be dumped into creeks. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is encouraging applications for discharge permits, even as studies reveal produced water contains harmful chemicals like PFAS and radioactive material. Environmental advocates and scientists express concerns over the lack of toxicity data and protective permits. The TCEQ, granted authority by the EPA, is poised to issue permits for discharges that include unregulated chemicals, while the state-funded Texas Produced Water Consortium is studying treatment viability. Critics argue Texas is advancing ahead of scientific research, risking environmental and public health.

Texas faces significant environmental challenges due to produced water spills from oil and gas drilling, particularly in the Permian Basin and East Texas. The spills have contaminated groundwater, killed wildlife, and led to costly clean-up efforts. Regulatory bodies like the Railroad Commission of Texas have been criticized for inadequate responses and lack of stringent reporting requirements. Lawsuits from affected landowners highlight the ongoing struggle for redress and the persistent environmental impact of these spills.

The article investigates the collapse of buildings in Mexico City's earthquake, revealing that many had been the subject of safety complaints. Residents lodged thousands of complaints about construction violations since 2012, but the city government often ignored them. The Environmental and Zoning Prosecutor’s Office (PAOT) and other organizations like Suma Urbana indicate a pattern of neglect and corruption, where developers bypass regulations and city authorities fail to enforce building codes. The article highlights cases where buildings that collapsed had previously been reported for safety issues, yet no action was taken. It also discusses the role of the 'Director Responsible for Construction' (DRO) and instances of misconduct among them. The article underscores the deadly consequences of corruption and the lack of accountability in Mexico City's urban development and earthquake preparedness.

The article discusses the controversial visit of then-US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump to Mexico and his meeting with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto. Mexicans expressed indignation, shame, and anger over the visit, especially in light of Trump's previous derogatory comments about Mexico and its people. The meeting's aftermath left many questioning Pena Nieto's judgment, particularly as it followed a series of scandals involving the president, including plagiarism allegations and unresolved issues such as the disappearance of 43 students. The article also touches on the political implications for Pena Nieto, whose popularity is at an all-time low, and the potential impact on his party's future prospects.

The article discusses the surge in undocumented Cuban immigration to the United States through Mexico following the announcement of re-opened diplomatic relations between the US and Cuba. Many Cubans fear that the Cuban Adjustment Act, which allows Cubans who reach US soil to stay, may change, prompting a mass migration. The journey is perilous, with many paying bribes to cross countries like Colombia and Panama. Mexico has seen a threefold increase in Cuban immigration detentions from 2014 to 2015. Cubans are taking advantage of 'safe passage' visas from Mexican authorities, and despite an agreement for deportation, Mexico rarely sends Cubans back, often issuing them exit visas instead. The recent meeting between Cuban President Raul Castro and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto has raised concerns that the ease of passage through Mexico may soon change.

A significant increase in Cuban migrants traveling through Mexico to reach the US is driven by fears of potential changes in US immigration laws following the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the US and Cuba. Many Cubans are opting for the land route through Mexico, taking advantage of 'safe passage' visas issued by Mexican authorities. The journey is fraught with challenges, including corruption and extortion, but the migrants are determined to reach the US. The article highlights the experiences of several Cuban migrants and the broader implications of US, Cuban, and Mexican immigration policies.