The article argues that the term 'ethnic cleansing' is a euphemism that obscures the reality of genocide, particularly in the context of the Palestinian conflict. It draws parallels with the Bosnian War, emphasizing that 'ethnic cleansing' is not a legally defined crime and serves to dehumanize victims. The piece calls for the recognition of genocidal practices and criticizes the international community for perpetuating misleading terminology.

The article argues that the term 'ethnic cleansing' is a euphemism for genocide, drawing parallels between the Bosnian genocide in the 1990s and the current situation in Gaza. It criticizes the use of the term 'ethnic cleansing' as part of genocide denial and calls for proper terminology to ensure accountability and respect for victims. The text highlights the systematic targeting and massacring of Palestinian civilians by the Israeli army, with the backing of political leaders, and condemns the lack of sufficient action to stop the genocide.

The article discusses the sinking of a vessel off the coast of Pylos, Greece, which was under surveillance by Frontex, the European Union’s border security agency. Despite being aware of the vessel's distress, Frontex did not intervene promptly, leading to the loss of hundreds of lives. The agency's actions, as well as those of the Greek coastguard, are under scrutiny. The article criticizes Frontex for its failure to prevent human rights violations and for not using its significant resources to save lives. It also highlights the agency's defensive stance during a seminar in Warsaw, where it focused on terminology and legal protections rather than its humanitarian responsibilities. The author argues that the EU's approach to migration is overly punitive and calls for a more compassionate and responsible use of power to save lives and uphold human dignity.

The article discusses the sinking of a vessel off the coast of Pylos, Greece, which was under surveillance by Frontex, the European Union’s border security agency. Despite being aware of the vessel's distress, Frontex did not intervene, leading to the loss of hundreds of lives. The article criticizes Frontex's lack of action and the EU's approach to immigration, highlighting the agency's significant budget and its failure to prevent human rights violations at EU borders. It also recounts the author's visit to Frontex headquarters during the incident, where the agency's representatives focused on correcting misconceptions rather than addressing the ongoing tragedy. The article suggests that the EU's policies criminalize migration and calls for a more humane approach that values human lives over border control.

The article recounts the author's experiences in Belgrade, Serbia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. After Serbia closed its borders, a curfew was imposed, and the government began to enforce strict measures, including building a temporary hospital. President Aleksandar Vučić's address sparked protests against his administration's handling of the crisis. As the pandemic progressed, Serbia appeared to relax restrictions, but a report by BIRN suggested underreported COVID-19 data. Political tensions rose with hunger strikes and protests against the government's actions. Despite initial non-violent protests, the situation escalated with police violence. The author reflects on the contagious nature of both fear and hope amidst these events.

The article describes the dire conditions and police brutality faced by refugees in the Vučjak camp near Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The camp, situated on a former landfill and surrounded by minefields, is where men with no space in other camps are forced to live. The local Red Cross provides two daily meals, but the refugees, including minors, lack proper clothing and footwear, often as a result of attempts to cross the border or mistreatment by Croatian police. The article details an incident of a police officer assaulting a refugee and the subsequent intimidation of the journalist by police. It also covers earlier events of the day, where police segregated refugees at the Bira camp and forcibly transported them to Vučjak. The EU, through organizations like IOM, UNHCR, and DRC, funds the camps, but there is a lack of transparency in how the funds are used, with allegations that a significant portion is allocated to strengthening border control rather than improving conditions for migrants. The article criticizes the EU for witnessing the humanitarian crisis and violence at its borders without taking effective action.

Gill Phillips, director of editorial legal services at The Guardian, discusses the evolving role of media lawyers amidst the digital transformation of journalism. She has provided legal counsel on major stories like the Edward Snowden leaks and has seen increased dangers for journalists, including state surveillance and high-profile murders. Phillips emphasizes the importance of pre-publication legal work to avoid potential lawsuits and post-publication handling of legal complaints. She also notes the shift towards collaborative journalism, as seen in the Snowden, Paradise Papers, and Panama Papers cases, which has increased safety and allowed for more effective handling of large data sets. Phillips advocates for the necessity of media lawyers, especially in regions like the Balkans where investigative journalism faces autocratic regimes and limited legal support. She also addresses the challenges of protecting whistleblowers and the ethical responsibility of journalists to report the truth, distinguishing between fake news and propaganda.

The article discusses the violence and abuse faced by migrants at the borders of the European Union, with a focus on recent incidents recorded by No Name Kitchen, a volunteer group aiding migrants in Bosnia. It highlights cases of violence, including sexual violence, racism, and Islamophobia against migrants, particularly women, by border officials in countries like Croatia and Slovenia. The article criticizes the lack of action and condemnation from European leaders and contrasts the EU's response to migrant abuse with its reaction to the Cologne attacks in 2015. It also points out the hypocrisy of European liberals who condemn US policies but ignore abuses at EU borders. The author calls for accountability and action against these human rights violations, warning that ignoring them could lead to a Europe where violence against 'the other' is acceptable.

The article highlights the violence and sexual abuse faced by migrants, particularly women, at the borders of the European Union. It criticizes the EU and its border police for their brutal treatment of migrants and the lack of accountability for these actions. The piece also condemns the media and European officials for their silence and hypocrisy in addressing these human rights abuses, drawing a parallel with the #MeToo movement and the need for Europe to learn from its past mistakes.

The article discusses the situation in Idomeni, a small village near the Greek-Macedonian border, which became a provisional refugee camp after the Balkan route was closed, leaving around 15,000 refugees and migrants stranded. The camp was known for its sense of community and solidarity among volunteers and refugees. However, the European Union is criticized for its failure to handle the crisis, as the refugees were eventually moved to government-run camps with poor conditions and limited freedom. The article highlights the despair and loss felt by the refugees and volunteers, as independent camps like Idomeni and EKO station were shut down, and the refugees were dispersed to various camps, severing the close ties they had formed.